Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
https://sheffieldretiredgreyhounds.org
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Corcass Rangerd 2y 8 | T D Coote — 18% R546 W100 P275 Trainer form — last 3 months | 58 | 48 | 86 (1) | 62 (2) | 69 (2) | 82 (1) | 81 (1) | 69 (2) | 82 (1) | 65 (3) | 75 (2) | 82 (1) | 63 | 65 | 16 | 72 | 75 | 65 | 1 | 2/1 | ||
| 2 | ▶ Drumdoit Sheebab 2y 17 | J Andrews — 19% R238 W45 P127 Trainer form — last 3 months | 51 | 64 | 81 (3) | 74 (2) | 61 (3) | 81 (1) | 88 (1) | 67 (2) | 68 (2) | 60 (2) | 55 (4) | 80 (1) | 35 | 50 | 18 | 54 | 72 | 52 | 2 | 9/2 | ||
| 3 | ▶ Romeo Zoned 2y 9 | J Andrews — 19% R238 W45 P127 Trainer form — last 3 months | 47 | 65 | 85 (1) | 78 (1) | 75 (1) | 53 (4) | 73 (1) | 70 (1) | 57 (2) | 35 (1) | 47 (5) | 60 (2) | 65 | 53 | 30 | 62 | 69 | 57 | 4 | 9/2 | ||
| 4 | ▶ Thurlesbeg Lexyb 2y 26 | R A Draper — 29% R263 W76 P171 Trainer form — last 3 months | 51 | 57 | 69 (4) | 67 (3) | 46 (3) | 86 (1) | 59 (5) | 82 (1) | 78 (1) | 61 (4) | 51 (4) | - | 36 | 49 | - | 36 | 66 | 46 | 3 | 10/11F | ||
| 5 | ▶ Bathams Big Toed 2y 37 | A R Upton — 20% R91 W18 P57 Trainer form — last 3 months | 44 | 41 | 61 (3) | 80 (1) | 60 (3) | 70 (2) | 58 (4) | 71 (1) | 61 (2) | 69 (1) | 47 (4) | 57 (3) | 27 | 38 | - | 50 | 66 | 48 | 5 | 50/1 | ||
| 6 | ▶ Grouchos Champd 2yN/R 25 | R A Draper — 29% R263 W76 P171 Trainer form — last 3 months | 46 | 45 | 75 (3) | 88 (1) | 64 (4) | 64 (4) | 62 (1) | 56 (5) | 73 (2) | 90 (1) | 75 (2) | 57 (3) | 34 | 18 | 8 | 19 | 66 | 44 | - | - | ||
Romeo Zone draws the statistically dominant trap at A2 500m Sheffield, where trap three has produced 31.58% of winners in the historical dataset — the highest figure of any trap at this grade and distance. He is the composite rank two in the field and has demonstrated the ability to win at A2 grade at this venue, giving the draw advantage a reliable horse to back it up. The combination of structural trap dominance and genuine A2 ability is a well-grounded selection, even though the composite leader draws a worse position. Tentative confidence reflects the overall quality of this A2 contest — at this level, the margins between runners are thin and any dog can be competitive.
The strongest runner by the model — but T1 carries a 14pp draw disadvantage vs T3 at this grade.
Third composite with the second-worst draw — ratings do not compensate for the structural disadvantage.
Good draw but ratings trail the front three — mid-field at best.
Below the leading group on both primary metrics — unlikely to be involved.
Bottom of composite with the weakest draw at A2 500m — very unlikely to factor.
Trap three at A2 500m Sheffield dominates with a 31.58% win rate — almost double trap one. Trap two is historically the second-worst draw (8.7%). The structural advantage of T3 is sufficient to prefer a composite R2 in that trap over the composite R1 in T1.
T1:17.19% T2:8.7% T3:31.58% T4:21.05% T5:14.47% T6:7.89%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 500m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Corcass Ranger | 30 | 100 | Closer |
2Drumdoit Sheeba | 100 | 0 | Fader |
3Romeo Zone | 49 | 49 | All-Rounder |
4Thurlesbeg Lexy | 51 | 51 | All-Rounder |
5Bathams Big Toe | 23 | 100 | Closer |
6Grouchos Champ | 53 | 41 | All-Rounder |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.