| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Essjay Alfredd 3y 42 | - | - | 40 | 14 | 30 (6) | 53 (4) | 41 (6) | 40 (1) | 33 (3) | 27 (4) | 28 (4) | 75 (6) | 62 (1) | - | 15 | 13 | 12 | 13 | 41 | 23 | 1 | 5/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Tre Coold 2y 15 | - | - | 87 | 50 | 60 (5) | 73 (2) | 65 (4) | 56 (4) | 84 (2) | 48 (4) | 90 (1) | 56 (6) | 68 (3) | 78 (3) | 33 | 47 | - | 23 | 67 | 46 | 5 | 15/8 | |
| 3 | ▶ Fabulous Evab 2y 26 | - | - | 74 | 59 | 55 (6) | 61 (4) | 77 (2) | 91 (1) | 38 (1) | 22 (5) | 58 (2) | 36 (2) | 59 (3) | 46 (6) | 24 | 42 | - | 26 | 58 | 40 | 4 | 7/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Gurtnacrehy Ohiod 3y 23 | - | - | 49 | 20 | 38 (2) | 27 (6) | 29 (5) | 31 (4) | 30 (6) | 42 (1) | 27 (5) | 53 (5) | 55 (4) | 50 (4) | 55 | 37 | 31 | 15 | 35 | 35 | 2 | 10/3 | |
| 5 | ▶ Keeperhill Duked 3y 15 | - | - | 42 | 91 | 47 (5) | 53 (2) | 62 (5) | 78 (2) | 51 (4) | 66 (4) | 52 (5) | 45 (5) | 55 (5) | 56 (5) | 23 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 57 | 30 | 3 | 13/8F | |
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 500m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Essjay Alfred | 48 | 58 | Closer |
2Tre Cool | 69 | 31 | Fader |
3Fabulous Eva | 77 | 0 | Fader |
4Gurtnacrehy Ohio | 50 | 50 | All-Rounder |
5Keeperhill Duke | 0 | 100 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.