Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Moss Row Jennyb 4y 15 | P Ward — 16% R223 W35 P117 Trainer form — last 3 months | 48 | 47 | 26 (3) | 21 (4) | 20 (5) | 30 (1) | 17 (6) | 28 (2) | 20 (4) | 22 (3) | 18 (5) | 19 (5) | 27 | 25 | 18 | 22 | 23 | 25 | 4 | 7/2 | ||
| 2 | ▶ Clodaghs Giftd 4y 18 | P Clarke — 15% R532 W80 P295 Trainer form — last 3 months | 56 | - | 31 (1) | 26 (3) | 22 (4) | 27 (3) | 24 (4) | 23 (4) | 24 (2) | 24 (3) | 28 (4) | - | 25 | 25 | 36 | 18 | 24 | 25 | 2 | 9/4 | ||
| 3 | ▶ Salems Sangriad 3y 34 | J Pearson — 15% R209 W32 P105 Trainer form — last 3 months | 53 | 51 | 47 (2) | 19 (6) | 49 (2) | 33 (6) | 46 (5) | 38 (2) | 24 (4) | 41 (4) | 32 (5) | - | 26 | 28 | 20 | 12 | 36 | 17 | 3 | 6/1 | ||
| 4 | ▶ Rathmeehan Judib 4y 44 | P Clarke — 15% R532 W80 P295 Trainer form — last 3 months | 46 | - | 44 (4) | 64 (1) | 17 (5) | 20 (5) | 20 (4) | 21 (3) | 25 (3) | 25 (2) | 23 (4) | 27 (3) | 34 | 27 | 27 | 16 | 22 | 22 | 6 | 8/1 | ||
| 5 | ▶ Royston Rubbled 2y 17 | D R E Ellerker — 20% R665 W132 P349 Trainer form — last 3 months | 47 | 53 | 19 (5) | 39 (3) | 19 (4) | 24 (2) | 15 (5) | 19 (5) | 31 (1) | 24 (1) | 18 (5) | 24 (2) | 19 | 23 | 26 | 30 | 25 | 20 | 5 | 7/2 | ||
| 6 | ▶ Essjay Julieb 4y 26 | S A Saberton — 23% R389 W89 P251 Trainer form — last 3 months | 49 | - | 15 (5) | 22 (4) | 16 (5) | 26 (2) | 18 (5) | 26 (2) | 25 (2) | 30 (1) | 21 (3) | 26 (2) | 37 | 31 | 46 | 31 | 23 | 27 | 1 | 15/8F | ||
Essjay Julie presents a powerful structural argument as the selection in this D5 sprint. She holds the highest composite in the race at 27, the best track suitability at 31, the best distance suitability at 31, and occupies trap 6 — the dominant draw at Harlow D5 238m, winning 21.8% of races. No other dog in this field combines top ratings with the best trap draw simultaneously. She ran fourth at D5 238m Harlow on May 11, showing she is active and familiar with the conditions, and the overall suitability profile marks her as the most Harlow-sprint-adapted runner in the contest. When the ratings, form, and draw all align in the same direction, the argument for the selection is compelling. She may not be a barnstormer in terms of pure ability but in D5 company this combination of factors is more than sufficient.
Very recent form at the right C&D — the main danger if things go against the selection.
Regular D5 sprinter but fifth place last time limits confidence — likely a minor placing at best.
High raw performance rating but almost all from 415m — the sprint switch creates too much uncertainty to trust.
Poor draw combined with modest ratings and a fifth-place run — not a threat in this company.
Recent 415m runner with some sprint history — an unknown rather than a clear threat; monitor for next time over sprints.
Trap 6 wins 21.8% of D5 sprints at Harlow — the highest of any draw. A dog combining the best trap with the highest course-and-distance suitability holds a meaningful structural edge.
T1:17.6% T2:14.9% T3:14.5% T4:14.1% T5:17.3% T6:21.8%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 238m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.