Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Jura Yala Enkib 4y 26 | M J Rice — 22% R123 W27 P78 Trainer form — last 3 months | 49 | 39 | 55 (4) | 61 (2) | 32 (1) | 58 (2) | 22 (1) | 28 (3) | 55 (4) | 20 (6) | 53 (2) | 51 (2) | 53 | 45 | 31 | 46 | 45 | 35 | 2 | 7/1 | ||
| 2 | ▶ Eire Queenieb 3y 16 | D R Jinks — 17% R539 W89 P293 Trainer form — last 3 months | 33 | 46 | 45 (3) | 19 (4) | 21 (5) | 18 (2) | 22 (1) | 63 (1) | 64 (1) | 44 (4) | 39 (5) | 24 (3) | 16 | 31 | 15 | 10 | 34 | 21 | 5 | 7/1 | ||
| 3 | ▶ Deelish Mackd 3y 28 | P S Rea — 16% R504 W83 P250 Trainer form — last 3 months | 78 | 57 | 55 (2) | 62 (2) | 72 (1) | 70 (1) | 12 (5) | 14 (6) | 15 (3) | 67 (2) | 76 (2) | 86 (1) | 43 | 39 | - | - | 53 | 34 | 3 | 1/2F | ||
| 4 | ▶ Kilbride Duchessb 2y 7 | D R Jinks — 17% R539 W89 P293 Trainer form — last 3 months | 46 | 65 | 23 (5) | 27 (3) | 24 (1) | 46 (4) | 49 (3) | 60 (3) | 75 (1) | 62 (2) | 65 (2) | 71 (2) | 23 | 23 | - | 20 | 42 | 31 | 4 | 6/1 | ||
| 5 | ▶ Battle Dotb 2y 17 | D R E Ellerker — 20% R676 W134 P356 Trainer form — last 3 months | 46 | 48 | 44 (5) | 31 (1) | 21 (4) | 43 (4) | 26 (2) | 35 (4) | 17 (5) | 23 (1) | 18 (6) | 25 (4) | 26 | 17 | 2 | 36 | 31 | 27 | 6 | 14/1 | ||
| 6 | ▶ Headford Oisind 5y 15 | M J Rice — 22% R123 W27 P78 Trainer form — last 3 months | 54 | - | 26 (4) | 33 (1) | 23 (4) | 28 (3) | 29 (2) | 33 (1) | 62 (5) | 23 (5) | 33 (1) | 25 (5) | 47 | 44 | 45 | 43 | 30 | 35 | 1 | 7/2 | ||
Headford Oisin draws from trap six — the second-best starting position at Harlow D4 238m at 20.56% — and carries the best track suitability in the field at 44, confirming genuine Harlow form. His distance suitability of 43 and trap suitability of 47 both rank among the field leaders, building a comprehensive C&D profile. His composite of 35 is tied for the top of the field. The case rests on structural positioning: from the second-best draw with the best venue credentials and a tied composite lead, he avoids the worst structural penalties while holding proven form credentials at the course and trip. Speed of 54 is competitive without being exceptional.
Best raw ability in the field by a considerable margin but hampered by the worst draw and zero C&D form — classic ability-versus-structure conflict.
Best draw, best consistency record, joint-best track suitability — a very close second to the selection and arguably the race with the pick. Well worth including in any combination.
Strong first-bend figure with decent consistency; a place candidate if the main contenders interfere with each other at the bend.
Modest ratings from a neutral draw — competitive at the lower end of the field but unlikely to challenge for the top positions.
Below-average on most measures with a notably low speed figure — difficult to make a case for her against the better-equipped runners.
Trap 3 carries the worst D4 238m draw at 16.22% — a near 6-point penalty against trap 1. The field's fastest raw speed is in trap 3 with zero C&D form, creating a classic structure-versus-speed selection dilemma
T1: 22.24% (best) T2: mid T3: 16.22% (worst) T4: mid T5: mid T6: 20.56%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 238m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.