The Future of Racing: PGR TV Stakes
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Emers Ciand 3y 5 | J Walton — 15% R68 W10 P29 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 45 | 29 (6) | 38 (4) | 50 (3) | 26 (4) | 24 (2) | 28 (3) | 30 (2) | 53 (1) | 15 (2) | - | 16 | 21 | 20 | 21 | 50 | 39 | 5 | 4/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Alnwick Bettyb 2y 6 | A Harrison — 20% R515 W101 P311 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 47 | 42 (6) | 74 (1) | 63 (1) | 32 (6) | 63 (2) | 60 (2) | 73 (1) | 67 (2) | 23 (4) | 47 (3) | 32 | 40 | 15 | 27 | 50 | 44 | 2 | 9/2 | |
| 3 | ▶ Anglesey Rolexd 2y 23 | D Blackbird — 17% R1088 W183 P589 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 30 | 77 | 55 (3) | 45 (6) | 35 (1) | 21 (5) | 27 (2) | 26 (4) | 26 (4) | 42 (5) | 56 (3) | 42 (5) | 42 | 14 | 11 | 36 | 47 | 41 | 3 | 4/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Fagans Eagleb 3y 21 | D Blackbird — 17% R1088 W183 P589 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 42 | 30 | 39 (5) | 51 (2) | 57 (1) | 41 (4) | 44 (3) | 47 (4) | 44 (4) | 42 (4) | 48 (3) | 15 (3) | 34 | 19 | 20 | 19 | 49 | 40 | 4 | 12/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Emmas Teddyb 2y 5 | J T Edgar — 16% R481 W78 P271 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 60 | 65 | 56 (2) | 44 (5) | 48 (3) | 39 (5) | 59 (2) | 47 (5) | 68 (1) | 44 (5) | 43 (5) | 34 (5) | 14 | 35 | 34 | 32 | 54 | 45 | 1 | 8/11F | |
Emmas Teddy has the clear class advantage in this A7 contest at AP54, sitting 4 points above the next best. While his Fader profile (EP76/CS0) would normally be concerning at Newcastle 480m, several factors work in his favour here. First, the class gap: at A7 level, a 4-point AP advantage is significant and means he can afford to lose ground late and still prevail. Second, his pace consistency is exceptional at PC90 — the highest in the field — meaning you know exactly what you're getting: reliable early speed with predictable run patterns. Third, his C&D record is by far the best here: 10 runs, 2 wins, 4 places (40% place rate), proving he CAN win at this venue despite the Fader tag. The T6 draw gives him early width but at Newcastle this isn't a major disadvantage. In a weak field where no closer has strong enough finishing speed to reel him in (Emers Cian has CS62 but 0 C&D wins, Anglesey Rolex has CS100 but PC32), his class and consistency should carry him through.
Danger — only front runner, could dominate weak A7 field from T2
Against — 0 wins from 10 C&D runs, closing speed only moderate
Too inconsistent — PC32 makes him impossible to trust despite CS100
Against — 10 C&D runs with 0 wins suggests venue doesn't suit
Pace consistency and C&D form are key differentiators in low-grade 480m contests
No significant trap bias
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 480m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Emers Cian | 50 | 62 | Closer |
2Alnwick Betty | 56 | 45 | Front Runner |
3Anglesey Rolex | 19 | 100 | Closer |
4Fagans Eagle | 46 | 50 | All-Rounder |
6Emmas Teddy | 76 | 0 | Fader |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.