Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Freyas Tigerb 2y 6 | D D Porter — 17% R521 W90 P286 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 47 (4) | 33 (5) | 56 (2) | 50 (3) | 38 (4) | 33 (6) | 44 (2) | 60 (1) | 55 (1) | 35 (3) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 3/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Da Foxd 3y 16 | N J Deas — 17% R447 W76 P245 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 30 (6) | 32 (5) | 25 (6) | 67 (1) | 31 (6) | 43 (4) | 41 (5) | 58 (1) | 24 (3) | 24 (5) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 9/2 | |
| 3 | ▶ Topper Shead 2y 7 | N J Deas — 17% R447 W76 P245 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 62 (1) | 46 (3) | 25 (4) | 61 (1) | 44 (3) | 51 (2) | 46 (4) | 46 (2) | 45 (3) | 35 (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 9/4 | |
| 4 | ▶ Happy Ever Afterb 5y 24 | P J Dolby — 13% R52 W7 P20 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 32 (6) | 42 (4) | 59 (1) | 42 (3) | 39 (5) | 36 (6) | 35 (6) | 49 (2) | 42 (5) | 67 (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | 9/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Magical Herod 3y 15 | D Jeans — 12% R242 W30 P109 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 36 (4) | 33 (5) | 35 (5) | 38 (4) | 45 (4) | 57 (1) | 47 (3) | 35 (6) | 56 (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 16/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Trapstyle Sleepyb 2y 25 | J M Liles — 19% R423 W79 P222 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 33 (3) | 58 (1) | 45 (4) | 33 (6) | 31 (6) | 36 (1) | 35 (1) | 29 (3) | 49 (3) | 61 (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | 13/8F | |
Two wins from her last three starts at course and distance is the standout form line in this field, and her most recent performance figure of 60 was a significant step up from her earlier career efforts in the 30s. She's clearly improving and the rail draw gives her the inside running through every bend at this 500 metre trip. The concern is speed — her average of 93.2 is the lowest in the field by some margin — but she's been winning despite that, which suggests she compensates with good track sense and race positioning.
Running into form at the right time with consistent course and distance placings — the main danger to the selection.
Declining form makes it hard to back with any confidence despite proven course and distance form.
Has the course and distance form but recent performances suggest she's off the pace.
Capable of winning but equally capable of finishing last — too unpredictable to rely on.
Form on the slide with no recent course and distance form to inspire confidence — others preferred.
Extremely flat trap bias with no box performing significantly above or below expected. Low composite separation (4.3pp between R1 and R3) confirms this is a grade where the model struggles to separate runners. Form and race shape narrative become more important than structural positioning.
T1:17.9% T2:19.1% T3:19.1% T4:18.8% T5:20.3% T6:18.1%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 500m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.