THE FUTURE OF RACING: PGR TV
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Geneva Orlab 4y 24 | I E Walker — 13% R241 W32 P113 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 96 | 13 (6) | 13 (6) | 30 (1) | 20 (4) | 25 (2) | 13 (6) | 13 (6) | 45 (4) | 23 (3) | 27 (3) | 31 | 32 | 17 | 26 | 18 | 22 | 1 | 9/4 | |
| 2 | ▶ Fadh To Godb 3y 5 | S W Deakin — 17% R519 W87 P242 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 42 | 0 | 17 (5) | 12 (6) | 19 (4) | 14 (6) | 14 (5) | 13 (6) | 29 (6) | 18 (1) | 16 (5) | - | 39 | 19 | 17 | 19 | 18 | 21 | 4 | 12/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Drahbeg Dancerb 6y 44 | G B Ballentine — 15% R107 W16 P56 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 50 | 24 (5) | 42 (4) | 37 (4) | 20 (6) | 64 (6) | 55 (1) | 39 (3) | 62 (5) | 46 (1) | - | 52 | - | 40 | - | 42 | 46 | 6 | 7/2 | |
| 4 | ▶ Hillend Jesseb 1y 4 | R Williams — 15% R321 W47 P156 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 45 | - | 23 (3) | 16 (5) | 15 (5) | 26 (2) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 14 | 28 | - | 28 | - | 8 | 3 | 4/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Lady Pacificob 5y 25 | I E Walker — 13% R241 W32 P113 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 57 | - | 20 (4) | 25 (6) | 24 (3) | 18 (5) | 18 (2) | 20 (6) | 21 (5) | - | - | - | 16 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 21 | 18 | 5 | 7/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Combinationb 4y 15 | S J Cull — 11% R101 W11 P55 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | - | 15 (6) | 30 (1) | 23 (3) | 20 (5) | 21 (4) | 15 (6) | 23 (3) | 12 (6) | 19 (4) | 24 (2) | 31 | 25 | 24 | 25 | 20 | 22 | 2 | 15/8F | |
Extraordinary bend rating (96) dominates field—exceptional turn aptitude for 270m sprint. Places dead T1 trap (12.28%) representing structural disadvantage, yet model rates highest indicating bend merit overrides trap placement. Form at D4 modest (P20, P25, P13, P13, P22) but recent runs competitive (4th, 2nd, 6th, 6th suggesting improvement trajectory). Speed 48 mid-field. Selection risky given dead trap but bend superiority suggests pace profiling error by structural data—early pace individual advantage carries model.
Trap advantage negated by form inconsistency and low trainer statistics.
Dominant trap negated by poor suitability metrics and absence-affected form.
Form foundation undermined by limited D4 runs; suitability metrics suggest misfit.
Pure closer profile structurally disqualified at 270m sprint distance.
Complete unknown with only trials; insufficient competitive form for assessment.
Multiple dominant traps (5.07pp separation between R1 and R3) create unpredictable field. Few runners leverage structural advantage through form consistency.
T5:22.92% T6:21.95% T4:20.83% T2:20.34% T1:12.28% T3:8.16%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 270m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.