| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Fords Gambled 4y 42 | - | - | 53 | 21 | 76 (2) | 78 (2) | 72 (3) | 78 (4) | 62 (4) | 59 (3) | 83 (1) | 46 (6) | 100 (1) | 53 (4) | 5 | 20 | 26 | 19 | 72 | 35 | 1 | 10/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Romeo Abilityd 2y 19 | - | - | 81 | 64 | 84 (2) | 94 (1) | 59 (1) | 79 (5) | 43 (3) | 64 (4) | 55 (5) | 97 (5) | 97 (1) | - | 30 | 49 | 30 | 54 | 75 | 55 | 4 | 2/5F | |
| 3 | ▶ Innfield Charmb 4y 43 | - | - | 0 | 0 | 85 (3) | 100 (1) | 73 (4) | 88 (2) | 64 (4) | 82 (4) | 97 (1) | 76 (5) | 79 (4) | 83 (2) | 15 | 23 | 5 | - | 84 | 42 | 3 | 25/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Fabulous Liviab 3y 27 | - | - | 50 | 70 | 81 (1) | 56 (5) | 34 (4) | 37 (3) | 43 (1) | 55 (4) | 41 (5) | 85 (2) | 48 (1) | 34 (3) | 42 | 26 | 29 | 37 | 53 | 41 | 5 | 9/4 | |
| 6 | ▶ Knockard Joed 3y 17 | - | - | 35 | 69 | 43 (5) | 46 (6) | 71 (5) | 56 (5) | 48 (4) | 73 (5) | 61 (3) | 82 (5) | 46 (2) | - | 29 | 4 | 34 | 19 | 56 | 31 | 2 | 16/1 | |
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 500m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Fords Gamble | 50 | 50 | All-Rounder |
2Romeo Ability | 100 | 0 | Fader |
3Innfield Charm | 0 | 100 | Closer |
4Fabulous Livia | 100 | 0 | Fader |
6Knockard Joe | 0 | 100 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.