| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | Bet | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | ||||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Heathmill Barrond 4y 25 | D Calvert — 16% R584 W95 P336 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 33 (3) | 24 (5) | 32 (3) | 42 (1) | 40 (1) | 34 (3) | 24 (5) | 41 (1) | 35 (3) | 36 (2) | 34 | 35 | 35 | 31 | 33 | 31 | 4 | 5/1 | - | |
| 2 | ▶ Tullycanna Lassb 2y 7 | S Watson — 30% R419 W124 P290 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 34 (2) | 35 (3) | 37 (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 39 | 37 | 18 | 36 | 35 | 36 | 1 | 13/8 | - | |
| 3 | ▶ Grouchos Badgerd 1y 6 | R J Overton — 18% R361 W64 P217 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 41 | - | 25 (4) | 34 (2) | 41 (1) | 35 (2) | 28 (4) | 53 (5) | 52 (5) | 31 (2) | 37 (1) | 31 (1) | 4 | 53 | 40 | 46 | 32 | 33 | 5 | 9/2 | - | |
| 4 | ▶ Cockneys Charmb 2y 15 | S J L Lapidge — 17% R324 W54 P189 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | - | 54 (3) | 38 (1) | 29 (4) | 25 (3) | 34 (1) | 51 (5) | 29 (5) | 31 (2) | 24 (2) | - | 25 | 26 | 19 | 37 | 31 | 29 | 2 | 16/1 | - | |
| 6 | ▶ Walter Jezabelled 3y 4 | K C Robins — 38% R16 W6 P11 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 57 | - | 36 (2) | 41 (6) | 52 (5) | 57 (5) | 68 (4) | 68 (3) | 48 (2) | 74 (4) | 67 (2) | - | 37 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 36 | 27 | 3 | 5/6F | - | |
Holds the highest composite rating in the field but is drawn in trap 2, which is one of the two worst draws at D2 grade here — producing winners at just 17.99% from 278 runs. She also has a limited recent record of only three runs, which makes the composite less reliable than a dog with an established pattern. The most recent effort was a 34-rated run at D2, showing she belongs at this level, but the structural trap disadvantage is a real concern at a sprint distance where early position matters significantly.
Good trap position and consistent C&D form. A realistic contender but composite rank 3.
Recent A4 form shows ability but trap 4 and distance switch to 275m are significant concerns.
Good trap and solid composite rank 2, but the lowest speed rating limits upside at a sprint.
Speed rank 1 with a 30% trainer win rate — two meaningful stacking signals at a sprint where speed is the primary predictor.
Traps 1 and 5 are the strongest draws at D2 Doncaster 275m, both around 24%. Traps 2 and 4 are structurally poor at under 18%. Speed rank 1 wins 27.93% — the strongest single metric.
T1:24.0% T2:18.0% T3:22.9% T4:17.5% T5:24.3% T6:20.7%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 275m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Only runs at exactly 275m — no cross-distance comparisons. Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Each dog's average pace per 10m at every distance they've run. Green = fastest, red = slowest — shows where each dog is naturally strongest. Today's distance (275m) is highlighted.
| Dog | 220m | 275m | 388m | 483m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heathmill Barron | — | 0.631 | — | — |
| 2 | Tullycanna Lass | — | 0.627 | — | — |
| 3 | Grouchos Badger | — | 0.637 | — | — |
| 4 | Cockneys Charm | — | 0.635 | — | 0.646 |
| 6 | Walter Jezabelle | 0.671 | 0.622 | 0.627 | — |
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.