Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Loverly Jubleyb 3y 27 | E G Samuels — 16% R633 W101 P354 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 31 | 44 | 71 (2) | 62 (2) | 63 (2) | 30 (3) | 62 (3) | 59 (2) | 35 (2) | 66 (2) | 57 (2) | 46 (2) | 45 | 52 | 52 | 53 | 63 | 58 | 5 | 6/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Eleanor Rigbyb 2y 6 | L Brown — 15% R125 W19 P63 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | 26 | 79 (1) | 25 (5) | 31 (2) | 34 (1) | 46 (5) | 65 (2) | 58 (5) | 72 (1) | 51 (4) | 56 (3) | 41 | 47 | - | 50 | 57 | 53 | 4 | 20/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Stormy Neymard 2y 7 | E G Samuels — 16% R633 W101 P354 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 52 | 36 (2) | 23 (5) | 46 (1) | 29 (5) | 41 (1) | 52 (4) | 51 (3) | 60 (1) | 31 (3) | 30 (4) | 100 | 49 | - | 37 | 37 | 46 | 2 | 6/4 | |
| 4 | ▶ The Other Gigib 2y 16 | K L Windebank — 17% R548 W92 P308 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 42 | 75 | 26 (3) | 25 (4) | 21 (5) | 35 (2) | 25 (3) | 31 (2) | 32 (2) | 56 (5) | 58 (2) | - | 43 | 48 | 28 | 37 | 40 | 41 | 3 | 6/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Swift Depotd 4yN/R 33 | J G Mullins — 18% R125 W23 P75 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 58 | 44 | 79 (2) | 68 (3) | 58 (5) | 83 (2) | 80 (2) | 96 (2) | 63 (1) | 52 (5) | 31 (2) | - | 52 | 73 | - | 60 | 65 | 64 | - | - | |
| 6 | ▶ Air Mixb 3y 5 | I J Barnard — 23% R262 W59 P162 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | - | 28 (4) | 32 (3) | 39 (1) | 24 (5) | 31 (5) | 28 (5) | 29 (5) | 33 (3) | 33 (2) | 29 (4) | 66 | 47 | 42 | 46 | 39 | 44 | 1 | 1/1F | |
The model's projected winner despite running for the second time tonight and having no clear pace profile data on record. The speed rating of 55 is strong for the grade and the trap suitability of 66 from the widest draw is the second-best individual trap score in the race. The overall rating of 39 is one of the lowest in the field, which makes this a puzzling selection at first glance. But the model clearly identifies something in the composite profile that the raw numbers don't immediately show — perhaps the speed and adaptability. Trained by Ian Barnard at 24%. The concern is obvious: second run of the night, lowest rated, no pace data, wide draw at 16.28% from 43 runs. This is a speculative pick that requires trust in the model over the visible form.
Perfect trap record with sharp early pace — the main danger in the sprint.
Best venue form and highest rated but lacks the sprint speed to dominate.
Well drawn but the closer profile in a sprint limits her winning chances.
Brilliant bend speed but terrible recent form — hard to trust.
Best speed and venue form but the closer profile in a sprint is risky.
Good composite separation at D2 level (R1 at 29.73% vs R3 at 18.18%). T5 shows 33.33% from 30 runs but the sample is too small to be reliable. T2 is the best box with adequate sample at 20.45% from 44 runs. 274 total runs is a moderate sample.
T1:19.7% T2:20.45% T3:17.02% T4:18.18% T5:33.33% T6:16.28%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 277m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.