Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
PETERS 1966 VINTAGE RACE
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Nightingale Crewd 2y 10 | C R Morris — 28% R246 W69 P165 Trainer form — last 3 months | 72 | - | 100 (1) | 100 (1) | 74 (5) | 59 (6) | 72 (5) | 100 (1) | 75 (5) | 100 (1) | 100 (1) | 78 (3) | 38 | 68 | 60 | 71 | 84 | 72 | 1 | 4/11F | ||
| 2 | ▶ Miami Sapphired 3y 46 | P W Young — 18% R1293 W239 P759 Trainer form — last 3 months | 47 | - | 79 (2) | 62 (5) | 61 (4) | 98 (1) | 72 (2) | 81 (2) | 67 (2) | 82 (1) | 65 (3) | 40 (6) | 24 | 33 | 37 | 33 | 72 | 47 | 5 | 8/1 | ||
| 3 | ▶ Joescourtsadd 2y 25 | A Kelly-pilgrim — 14% R211 W29 P94 Trainer form — last 3 months | 52 | 52 | 71 (5) | 86 (2) | 72 (4) | 54 (2) | 57 (1) | 54 (2) | 53 (2) | 46 (3) | 47 (5) | 35 (6) | 5 | 40 | 12 | - | 63 | 36 | 2 | 25/1 | ||
| 4 | ▶ Topper Conord 3y 24 | K M O'flaherty — 20% R314 W62 P164 Trainer form — last 3 months | 29 | 43 | 65 (3) | 58 (6) | 45 (6) | 69 (2) | 43 (6) | 58 (3) | 64 (2) | 42 (6) | 56 (4) | 65 (2) | 15 | 14 | - | - | 57 | 31 | 6 | 12/1 | ||
| 5 | ▶ Yahoo Breeb 2y 23 | P W Young — 18% R1293 W239 P759 Trainer form — last 3 months | 46 | 49 | 50 (5) | 50 (6) | 82 (1) | 46 (4) | 78 (1) | 56 (4) | 62 (4) | 55 (5) | 72 (1) | 60 (2) | - | 22 | - | - | 60 | 30 | 4 | 33/1 | ||
| 6 | ▶ Uncle Edd 2y 47 | P W Young — 18% R1293 W239 P759 Trainer form — last 3 months | 62 | 53 | 67 (5) | 55 (5) | 70 (3) | 73 (4) | 100 (1) | 54 (6) | 88 (1) | 66 (2) | 51 (3) | - | 38 | 39 | 32 | 24 | 70 | 40 | 3 | 3/1 | ||
Every metric aligns for Nightingale Crew in this race. She won here last week at OR 225m with a P100 performance — a maximum form reading — and lines up from T1 which posts a remarkable 32.35% win rate in this exact grade and distance combination at Romford. Her average performance rating of 84 is the highest in the field by a clear margin, and her Romford-specific suitability is outstanding: track 68, distance 71, class 60 — all built on repeated quality performances at this venue. The composite model rates her rank one, and the 25-point composite gap over the nearest rival confirms this is not a marginal selection. In a 225m sprint, the T1 advantage is at its most powerful because there is simply no time for runners to recover from positional disadvantage. She arrives in peak form, from the best draw, in a race where the structural edge is overwhelming.
Front Runner at 225m with Romford experience — best placed to push the pick if she misses the break.
Composite rank two but no 225m racing history — structural T3 position helps but trip experience is a genuine caveat.
T2 at 6.25% is the worst draw at this distance — structural deficit is near-impossible to overcome for a Fader.
No 225m racing record and poor recent form — out-of-trip runner at a specialist distance.
Lowest-rated runner in the field with minimal Romford credentials — not a realistic winning threat here.
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 225m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.