| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Townsend Tonyab 2y 17 | D R Jinks — 16% R534 W85 P292 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | - | 39 (4) | 29 (2) | 25 (3) | 29 (2) | 25 (4) | 28 (2) | 19 (3) | 21 (3) | 26 (3) | 25 (4) | 32 | 38 | 33 | 38 | 26 | 30 | 4 | 10/3 | |
| 2 | ▶ Doreens Poppyb 2y 6 | K G Crew — 31% R35 W11 P23 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | - | 22 (5) | 16 (6) | 58 (2) | 47 (4) | 15 (4) | 23 (1) | 52 (2) | 40 (4) | 40 (5) | 66 (1) | 38 | 57 | 51 | 46 | 44 | 45 | 1 | 9/4JF | |
| 3 | ▶ Links Aphrodited 3y 13 | D R Jinks — 16% R534 W85 P292 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | - | 24 (1) | 20 (5) | 20 (4) | 23 (4) | 25 (3) | 33 (1) | 15 (5) | 21 (5) | 31 (2) | 28 (3) | 36 | 28 | 21 | 25 | 25 | 28 | 5 | 11/2 | |
| 4 | ▶ Sallins Flyerd 1y 13 | D R E Ellerker — 20% R684 W138 P359 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 40 | - | 20 (4) | 27 (3) | 30 (2) | 21 (5) | 34 (4) | 23 (4) | 50 (2) | 21 (1) | 21 (4) | 12 (6) | 7 | 37 | - | 39 | 24 | 23 | 6 | 10/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Edermine Bucksd 2y 7 | D R E Ellerker — 20% R684 W138 P359 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | - | 34 (1) | 24 (4) | 27 (3) | 27 (3) | 52 (2) | 33 (1) | 15 (5) | 18 (4) | 20 (4) | - | 44 | 38 | 31 | 41 | 27 | 34 | 2 | 9/4JF | |
| 6 | ▶ Snoozing Plumb 5y 25 | D R Jinks — 16% R534 W85 P292 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | - | 24 (4) | 30 (2) | 24 (3) | 33 (1) | 19 (4) | 21 (2) | 26 (3) | 27 (3) | 24 (4) | 29 (2) | 36 | 30 | 40 | 36 | 27 | 30 | 3 | 5/2 | |
Doreens Poppy selection is anchored on two primary factors overriding structural T2 weakness. First, significant class drop from A7/A6 assignments to D4 represents genuine advantage—previous grade was higher caliber and this dog is over-graded for D4 level. Crew trainer shows exceptional 28% win rate indicating stable in peak form, strongest trainer metric on evening card. Composite 45 exceeds field by 11 points representing substantial quality edge. However, fader pattern (EP:33 CS:0) creates sustainability concern though at 238m sprint the fade pattern is less relevant as pace should naturally decline in final stages regardless. T2 trap at 16.61% is meaningfully weak, sitting well below average. Speed 52 is modest but adequate for D4 level. Form from higher grade (A7/A6) doesn't transfer directly but trainer 28% hot streak suggests current condition. Selection is conditional on class edge and trainer hot form overcoming T2 structural liability.
DANGER—T1 advantage with recent form, but weak metrics overall
OUTSIDER—no pace profile and weak composite limit options
OUTSIDER—lowest composite and weakest speed in field
OUTSIDER—mid-field composite without pace advantage
OUTSIDER—T6 dominance wasted on weak dog quality
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 238m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.