Friday Night Winning Deal @ Sunderland Dogs Stakes
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Darbyshill Nancyb 3y 26 | C Mcnicholas — 17% R516 W88 P265 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 38 | 25 (4) | 21 (6) | 24 (4) | 36 (1) | 23 (6) | 32 (1) | 26 (2) | 44 (4) | 32 (1) | 26 (2) | 29 | 51 | 26 | 44 | 29 | 33 | 4 | 4/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Knocknadoguegiftb 2y 16 | P Miller — 17% R501 W87 P263 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 51 | 12 (6) | 32 (1) | 40 (4) | 24 (5) | 37 (5) | 34 (5) | 45 (4) | 55 (2) | 60 (2) | 57 (2) | 36 | 51 | - | 24 | 40 | 39 | 2 | 4/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Louis Hopeb 2y 8 | M K Bulmer — 20% R238 W47 P133 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 50 | 24 (5) | 36 (1) | 30 (2) | 27 (2) | 28 (2) | 28 (4) | 29 (2) | 27 (2) | 23 (4) | 23 (6) | 41 | 27 | 15 | 20 | 40 | 36 | 3 | 2/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Push Your Luckd 3y 17 | G A Stark — 19% R275 W53 P145 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | - | 18 (4) | 19 (5) | 30 (1) | 19 (1) | 20 (5) | 18 (4) | 23 (6) | 28 (4) | 22 (4) | - | 51 | 40 | - | 24 | 25 | 30 | 6 | 9/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Avongate Shineb 3y 7 | P Miller — 17% R501 W87 P263 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 43 | 53 | 22 (4) | 28 (2) | 26 (3) | 21 (3) | 21 (5) | 25 (2) | 22 (5) | 24 (3) | 45 (5) | 64 (3) | 53 | 48 | 14 | 35 | 39 | 41 | 1 | 10/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Must Be Goodb 3yREP 14 | P Miller — 17% R501 W87 P263 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | - | 24 (5) | 22 (6) | 30 (3) | 23 (5) | 37 (2) | 35 (1) | 32 (1) | 26 (2) | 26 (3) | 18 (6) | 39 | 36 | 56 | 24 | 26 | 28 | 5 | 15/8F | |
Knocknadoguegift has been running over 450 metres recently at A5 and A6 level, so the switch back to the 261-metre sprint is a change of tactics. His best performance of 40 last time was respectable, and the P Miller yard at 24% is one of the stronger trainer records in the field. Trap 2 at 21.9% is one of the three dominant middle-trap positions that win well at this grade, and the structural advantage is significant at a sprint distance where early position matters so much. The concern is his only recent sprint run — a fifth at D3 in 16.50 which was moderate. He needs to show sharper early speed than that D3 effort to justify the pick.
Dominant trap and fastest clock — the structural and form evidence both point here as the main danger.
Only proven winner at this level but the dead rail draw at sprint distance makes it very hard to capitalise.
Good draw and class drop but poor recent form makes the win a stretch — more likely to fill a place.
Consistent D4 performer but modest times and a below-average draw limit her winning chances.
Limited ability from a below-average draw — others have stronger claims at this level.
Strong middle-trap bias — T3, T2, and T4 all win above expected rate. T1 dead despite the rail. R2 wins more than R1 in composite breakdown — further evidence of structural over ratings.
T1:11.7% T2:21.9% T3:24.8% T4:21.6% T5:17.8% T6:16.5%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 261m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.