Loading track analysis
Loading track analysis
A well-balanced circuit offering fair racing across all distances
Oxford Greyhound Stadium is a respected venue that provides quality greyhound racing in the South of England. The stadium has a long history in the sport and has earned a reputation as a fair, well-managed track where form analysis is rewarded and results correlate well with quality metrics.
Oxford operates regular meetings on the national BAGS circuit with cards featuring a range of graded racing. The venue attracts dogs and trainers from across the South and South-West of England, providing competitive fields across most grades. Its meetings are broadcast nationally, maintaining its profile in the off-course betting market.
For punters, Oxford is a straightforward track that rewards conventional form analysis. It doesn't have the extreme biases of tight tracks or the unique characteristics of venues like Yarmouth. Instead, it provides consistent, form-true racing where the best-rated dog in the race has a fair chance of winning regardless of draw.
Schedule: Regular weekly meetings
| Races | Wins | Win% | Places | Place% | Win P&L | Place P&L | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Time | 138 | 31 | 22% | 65 | 47% | £-29.74 | £-27.68 |
| Today | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | +£0.00 | +£0.00 |
1st pick performance · £1 level stakes at SP · Place = 1/4 odds top 2
Oxford's circuit is of medium proportions with moderately wide bends and good straight lengths. The track runs on a north-south long axis with the grandstand on the east side. The bends are wide enough to allow fair racing without severe inside bias, but not so wide that the first bend becomes irrelevant.
The run-up to the first bend is adequate, giving dogs time to establish position. The home straight provides reasonable opportunity for closers, and the back straight is of similar proportion. The overall circuit creates balanced racing where no single factor — draw, pace, stamina — dominates to an extreme degree.
The surface is standard sand that drains adequately and provides consistent racing. Going conditions tend to stay in the normal range, and the track is maintained to a good standard. The overall impression is of a well-proportioned, honest racing circuit.
Oxford plays as a balanced track where both front-runners and closers have chances. The moderately wide bends mean that inside draw provides a slight advantage but not a dominant one. Dogs need a combination of decent early pace and sustained speed — pure front-runners can win from good draws, while quality closers can find opportunities on the home straight.
Performance ratings are the strongest predictor at Oxford, which is what you'd expect from a fair circuit. The track doesn't have strong quirks or biases that override quality differences, so the form book tends to be reliable. Class droppers perform well here because the fair bends allow them to express their superior ability.
Oxford is a good track for punters who prefer conventional form analysis over specialist track knowledge. The results are more predictable from standard metrics than at venues with extreme characteristics.
| Distance | Races | Avg Field | Avg Winner Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 253m | 1219 | 0.6 | 15.48s |
| 450m | 3532 | 0.6 | 27.44s |
| 650m | 261 | 0.6 | 39.93s |
| 847m | 18 | 0 | 53.34s |
The Oxford sprint. Early pace matters at this short distance but the fair bends prevent extreme inside bias. A good test of breaking speed where trap draw is a moderate rather than dominant factor.
The standard Oxford trip. A balanced race that rewards overall quality. Both front-runners and closers have chances. Performance ratings are the strongest predictor — conventional form analysis at its most effective.
The longer trip. Stamina comes into play and the extra distance helps closers. Quality and sustained speed are the key factors. A good distance for identifying genuine class differences.
How to read this: In a fair 6-runner race, each trap would win ~17% and place (finish 1st or 2nd) ~33% of the time.
Win% = how often this trap produces the winner. Place% = how often this trap finishes 1st or 2nd (standard place bet).
+ / − columns show the difference from fair share — positive means the trap wins/places more than expected, negative means less.
| Trap | Runs | Wins | Win% | +/− | 1st/2nd | Place% | +/− | Avg Pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 609 | 110 | 18.1% | +1.4 | 234 | 38.4% | +5.1 | 3.17 |
| 2 | 834 | 178 | 21.3% | +4.6 | 345 | 41.4% | +8.1 | 3.03 |
| 3 | 877 | 181 | 20.6% | +3.9 | 335 | 38.2% | +4.9 | 3.16 |
| 4 | 833 | 148 | 17.8% | +1.1 | 299 | 35.9% | +2.6 | 3.20 |
| 5 | 888 | 174 | 19.6% | +2.9 | 354 | 39.9% | +6.6 | 3.08 |
| 6 | 704 | 157 | 22.3% | +5.6 | 294 | 41.8% | +8.5 | 3.02 |
| Trap | Runs | Wins | Win% | +/− | 1st/2nd | Place% | +/− | Avg Pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2082 | 440 | 21.1% | +4.4 | 875 | 42.0% | +8.7 | 3.00 |
| 2 | 2317 | 451 | 19.5% | +2.8 | 903 | 39.0% | +5.7 | 3.10 |
| 3 | 2439 | 510 | 20.9% | +4.2 | 949 | 38.9% | +5.6 | 3.12 |
| 4 | 2454 | 471 | 19.2% | +2.5 | 963 | 39.2% | +5.9 | 3.14 |
| 5 | 2233 | 447 | 20.0% | +3.3 | 875 | 39.2% | +5.9 | 3.12 |
| 6 | 1486 | 251 | 16.9% | +0.2 | 530 | 35.7% | +2.4 | 3.25 |
| Trap | Runs | Wins | Win% | +/− | 1st/2nd | Place% | +/− | Avg Pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 174 | 37 | 21.3% | +4.6 | 74 | 42.5% | +9.2 | 2.98 |
| 2 | 183 | 29 | 15.8% | -0.9 | 64 | 35.0% | +1.7 | 3.39 |
| 3 | 164 | 31 | 18.9% | +2.2 | 60 | 36.6% | +3.3 | 3.24 |
| 4 | 175 | 29 | 16.6% | -0.1 | 55 | 31.4% | -1.9 | 3.46 |
| 5 | 167 | 35 | 21.0% | +4.3 | 72 | 43.1% | +9.8 | 3.01 |
| 6 | 119 | 24 | 20.2% | +3.5 | 48 | 40.3% | +7.0 | 3.08 |
| Trap | Runs | Wins | Win% | +/− | 1st/2nd | Place% | +/− | Avg Pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 2 | 13.3% | -3.4 | 5 | 33.3% | 0.0 | 3.07 |
| 2 | 12 | 1 | 8.3% | -8.4 | 3 | 25.0% | -8.3 | 3.08 |
| 3 | 12 | 1 | 8.3% | -8.4 | 4 | 33.3% | 0.0 | 3.25 |
| 4 | 8 | 1 | 12.5% | -4.2 | 3 | 37.5% | +4.2 | 3.13 |
| 5 | 8 | 2 | 25.0% | +8.3 | 4 | 50.0% | +16.7 | 2.63 |
| 6 | 7 | 3 | 42.9% | +26.2 | 4 | 57.1% | +23.8 | 2.71 |
How often each going allowance occurs and its effect on run times. Positive = fast ground, negative = slow/heavy.
| Going | Label | Races | Avg Run Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| -140 | Very Heavy | 1 | 42.98s |
| -120 | Very Heavy | 1 | 42.74s |
| -100 | Very Heavy | 1 | 54.20s |
| -80 | Very Heavy | 9 | 28.50s |
| -70 | Very Heavy | 8 | 28.26s |
| -60 | Very Heavy | 27 | 33.47s |
| -50 | Very Heavy | 52 | 28.89s |
| -45 | Very Heavy | 20 | 41.18s |
| -40 | Very Heavy | 193 | 28.70s |
| -35 | Very Heavy | 3 | 15.76s |
| -30 | Heavy | 450 | 29.59s |
| -25 | Heavy | 13 | 15.95s |
| -20 | Heavy | 988 | 27.27s |
| -15 | Slow | 178 | 24.50s |
| -10 | Slow | 1361 | 24.11s |
| -5 | Normal | 398 | 15.72s |
| 0 | Normal | 1173 | 26.07s |
| +5 | Fast | 5 | 15.71s |
| +10 | Fast | 84 | 27.28s |
| +20 | Very Fast | 12 | 30.80s |
No trainer data for the last 30 days.
No dog data for the last 30 days.
How often the shortest-priced dog (market favourite) wins and places at Oxford. National average favourite win rate is approximately 30%.
Races analysed
4,075
Fav wins
36%
1448 wins
Fav places (top 2)
58%
2359 places
Avg winning SP
3.79
decimal odds
Fastest adjusted times in our database for each distance at Oxford.
Coppice Ronnie
14.72s · OR · 2025-04-12
Pandemonium Blue
15.06s · IT · 2025-06-02
Blue Drout
27.86s · S3 · 2026-03-06
Magical Luna
52.21s · OR · 2024-07-27
Breakdown of race grades at Oxford. Shows the type and quality of racing the track hosts.
A2
541 (11%)
A3
499 (10%)
A1
448 (9%)
OR
446 (9%)
A4
426 (8%)
D3
375 (7%)
A5
347 (7%)
D2
324 (6%)
A6
300 (6%)
D1
279 (5%)
A7
250 (5%)
A8
197 (4%)
D4
168 (3%)
A9
126 (2%)
OR1
91 (2%)
OR3
74 (1%)
OR2
66 (1%)
IT
54 (1%)
S1
47 (1%)
S2
34 (1%)
S3
11 (0%)
At Oxford, apply conventional form analysis with performance ratings and class as your primary factors. Trap draw is a secondary consideration — worth noting but not worth overriding clear quality differences for.
Place betting works well at Oxford because the fair racing produces consistent finishing patterns. Quality dogs rarely miss the frame entirely, and the moderate bends mean that interference is below average. Systematic approaches based on rating thresholds can produce steady returns.
Course form is moderately important — dogs familiar with Oxford tend to run to form here, but the track isn't so idiosyncratic that newcomers are automatically disadvantaged. Focus on overall quality and you'll find Oxford a rewarding venue for steady, form-based betting.
Data from 2022-08-16 to 2026-04-04 · 5,091 races analysed · 684 meetings
© ratethat.dog — The definitive greyhound racing analytics platform
Interference & Run Comment Patterns
The 10 most common run comments from the last 1,000 completed runs. High rates of "crowded" or "checked" indicate a track where interference affects results.
Mid
389/1000 runs (39%)
EP
314/1000 runs (31%)
Rls
243/1000 runs (24%)
SAw
143/1000 runs (14%)
Wide
136/1000 runs (14%)
RanOn
130/1000 runs (13%)
ClrRun
129/1000 runs (13%)
Crd1
100/1000 runs (10%)
QAw
85/1000 runs (9%)
RlsMid
70/1000 runs (7%)